The talks will take place in spring 2014. On the basis of the tenderers final offer after negotiati

Home Heli-intro Links Timeline Fighter intro Candidates Links Timeline PMV intro Candidates Links Timeline Newsletters Multimedia isotank Paris Airshow 2013 Oksboel, May 2013 Terma November 2012 Danish Airshow, June 2012 Lion Effort, April 2012 Owego, March 2012 Yeovil, Nov 2011 Zeltweg , June 2011 Paris Airshow, June 2011 Danish Airshow, june 2010 About nytkampfly.dk Lecture and analysis Advertising Media About nytkampfly.dk isotank Advertising
"Defence Logistics Organization has pr. 30 September 2013 sent promotional material to the prequalified suppliers. The four pre-qualified suppliers are BAE Systems Land & Armaments (USA), Elbit Systems (Israel), Nexter Systems (France) and Samsung Techwin (South Korea).
The next steps in the procurement process is that bidders are invited presentation meeting with Defence Acquisition isotank and Logistics in late October 2013, when tender documents are presented in detail, and where there will be an opportunity to ask questions.
The talks will take place in spring 2014. On the basis of the tenderers final offer after negotiating isotank process, making defense the final evaluation and expect to contracting can take place later in 2014. "
Is there anyone who can explain to me why we need a new artillery system? In addition to this we have had before, and an idea that it should be a "real" army want? Works for me as a difficult place outdated Cold War thinking behind that desire. Enough puts defense bill up to Denmark to be everything that has to do with war, but maybe you could join forces better places?
As one av viktigaste collar was the attention you would kunna transportera kanonerna with volatile isotank so you can nog lugnt utgå ifrån att de mer är för ämnade contingents in "Långtbortistan" än defense av Danish field. isotank
The acquisition of new artillery has nothing to do with outdated Cold War thinking to do. Artillery is as våbenart as relevant, necessary and useful on the battlefield as before. It is whether you operate with large cold war scenarios or in connection with the more contemporary conflicts, as in Afghanistan or Mali. An army without heavy support weapons that can provide indirect fire over long distances (up to 40km), is almost non-existent, at least not nearly as useful. Artillery is largely guarantor of the soldiers' safety and performance, so that the Danish forces in Afghanistan also have been necessary with English artillery support. Denmark has not even sent artillery and gets it hardly until sometime after the acquisition of new artillery. DK In other words, the time being dependent on other countries artillery. A dependence which can be problematic. Since it thus becomes other countries' military capabilities, which if not directly then at least indirectly determines what we can participate in. But why do we contribute so not only with its own artillery. The answer is because isotank the Danish artillery consisting of 155mm. artillery pieces of type M 109 is no longer lasting. Although military gear is generally made to last long, so there are still limits. Defence howitzers are from 1965, and over the years has been upgraded several times, but now they can not any longer. Are you unwilling gradually get parts for them. Besides they are not comparable in armor and in scope, compared to the many new artillery systems that have been and are being developed in these years. There have been major developments in the field artillery isotank in recent isotank years, especially concerning new grenade types with both long range plains and precision. This development also makes many other countries in recent years to develop and replace their artillery. In other words, high time that the army gets new modern artillery isotank system that will make it possible to both "Train as you fight" isotank and to issue in future isotank international missions. Hope not artillery being shelved once again. has previously been exposed. Politicians have a squiggle to forget the artillery when you should buy. Economic thoughtful considering how relatively small / cheap this purchase - 9-21 pcs. - Will be in relation to other impending equipment purchases.
Can not be used tanks to artillery support? Modern isotank tanks may as well use several isotank different types of ammunition they can get to the "front lines" isotank under most conditions, etc. Would not it be worthwhile to buy more tanks instead?
Now är jag no expert on the product itself artillery or stridsvagnar. But sak can väl utgå ifrån as in Afghanistan, the är stora områden with besvärlig Terräng. On sina stallen policy it is nog enklare att flyga in artillery on's rules on more or less permanent body items ingar och Där the är för svårframkomligt stridsvagnar. Denmark has tydligen had stridsvagnar Dar. Däremot so vet jag inte on today använder the av enbart pansarbandvagnar or whether they också have stridsvagnar?